Showing posts with label school. Show all posts
Showing posts with label school. Show all posts

Monday, December 08, 2008

Damn I'm Good

Program GPA: 3.98
Completed Courses (click on the grades below to view your official grade card)
CourseTitleCRGrade
GEN/300SKILLS FOR PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT3.00A
BSA/310BUSINESS SYSTEMS3.00A
CIS/319COMPUTERS AND INFORMATION PROCESSING3.00A
BSA/375FUNDAMENTALS OF BUSINESS SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT3.00A
CMGT/410PROJECT PLANNING & IMPLEMENTATION3.00A
POS/370PROGRAMMING CONCEPTS3.00A
DBM/380DATABASE CONCEPTS3.00A
NTC/360NETWORK AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS CONCEPTS3.00A
WEB/410WEB PROGRAMMING I3.00A
WEB/420WEB PROGRAMMING II3.00A-
WEB/431XML3.00A
PRG/420JAVA PROGRAMMING I3.00A
PRG/421JAVA PROGRAMMING II3.00A
POS/410SQL FOR BUSINESS3.00A
CMGT/440INTRODUCTION TO INFORMATION SYSTEMS SECURITY3.00A
POS/420INTRODUCTION TO UNIX3.00A
POS/421WINDOWS SERVER NETWORKING3.00A
CMGT/445APPLICATION IMPLEMENTATION3.00A
COMM/470COMMUNICATING IN THE VIRTUAL WORKPLACE3.00A
Posted by at 1 comment:
Labels:

Tuesday, December 02, 2008

Skool Stuff

Yesterday was the last day of the last class I am taking towards my degree. Today I begin studying to pass the Humanities CLEP to earn the six units. It is cheaper and faster then taking two miserable general ed classes.
Posted by at No comments:
Labels:

Monday, October 27, 2008

CMGT445 - Application Implementation

Julia Poulsen

CMGT/445 - BIT0608A

Grades through Week 5		 Cumulative Score:
99.5/100 (99.5%)

Grade : A
Posted by at No comments:
Labels:

Monday, September 15, 2008

POS421 Windows Server Networking


Grade Report: POS/421

Grade Summary (Week 1-Week 5)

 Grade: A
Total Percentage: 100%
Your Total Score: 100
Total Possible Score: 100

Week5
Possible Score Your Score
Discussion Question #1 1.0 1.0
Comment:
You provided a substantive response to this discussion question for this week.
Discussion Question #2 1.0 1.0
Comment:
You provided a substantive response to this discussion question for this week.
Discussion Question #3 1.0 1.0
Comment:
You provided a substantive response to this discussion question for this week.
Participation 3.0 3.0
Comment:
You sucessfully posted to the Main Forum four days (or more) out of the required
four per week. (Reference: Participation section in the syllabus)
Team Presentation 5.0 5.0
Comment:
The presentation was easy on the eyes (nice color/text combination). It followed
the content in your paper concisely. The notes accompanying the slides were
very well done and would certainly been a very supportive element in the course
of a live presentation. This is a very professional presentation in content and
visually. It would "sell" the concept to the client.
Team paper 25.0 25.0
Comment:
The introduction provided a brief explanation of what the team wished to
accomplish, provided some very important details, sold the concept, and gained
the confidence of the reader.
The Web Application discussion along with the Web Applications Layout diagrams
made a very clear point and convincing argument concerning sharing application
components. You did a very nice job of comparing Windows Server 2000 and
Windows Sever 2003 and supported your dialog with specifics such as included in
"Table 1". You made a good point by mentioning very concisely the fundamental
differences between Server 2000 and 2003 was scalability, security, and
stability.
You had a significant amount of references for this paper and used them well as
you referred to them though out your paper to support your discussions. This
provided a very professional level of credibility to the information in the
paper and made it very convincing. Based on your supportive content one would
have to agree with the recommendations you provided in the paper.
Week 5 Subtotal : 36 36
Cumulative Week 5 Subtotal : 100 100
Week 5 Feedback:

Week4
Possible Score Your Score
Discussion Question #1 1.0 1.0
Comment:
You provided a substantive response to this discussion question for this week.
Discussion Question #2 1.0 1.0
Comment:
You provided a substantive response to this discussion question for this week.
Discussion Question #3 1.0 1.0
Comment:
You provided a substantive response to this discussion question for this week.
Participation 3.0 3.0
Comment:
You sucessfully posted to the Main Forum four days (or more) out of the required
four per week. (Reference: Participation section in the syllabus)
File Systems Paper 10.0 10.0
Comment:
You provided an interesting introduction and established where you were going
with the paper. Overall you did a good job on the paper explaining some of the
popular file systems Windows has used, and in some cases is still using. You
moved through the discussion in a logical progression and provided some very
interesting detail and demonstrated depth of understanding with this paper. You
balanced you topic by explaining some of the disadvantages as well. You had
some very good references in your paper that added a significant amount of
authority to your content.
Week 4 Subtotal : 16 16
Cumulative Week 4 Subtotal : 64 64
Week 4 Feedback:

Week3
Possible Score Your Score
Discussion Question #1 1.0 1.0
Comment:
You provided a substantive response to this discussion question for this week.
Discussion Question #2 1.0 1.0
Comment:
You provided a substantive response to this discussion question for this week.
Discussion Question #3 1.0 1.0
Comment:
You provided a substantive response to this discussion question for this week.
Participation 3.0 3.0
Comment:
You sucessfully posted to the Main Forum four days (or more) out of the required
four per week. (Reference: Participation section in the syllabus)
OU Nesting Plan 14.0 14.0
Comment:
You did a good job and are persuasively continuing in a positive direction with
this proposal. It was very convincing; your conversational style in this
respect made it very understandable and easy to read. I particularly felt
comfortable with the structure and flow of this proposal. It was an easy read
and well done. The diagrams were very professional and provided significant
clarity to the proposal. I particularly appreciated the format and structure of
your paper. You specifically addressed the OU design with examples and backed
it up with very knowledge content. This is an excellent paper and addressed the
assignment precisely.
Week 3 Subtotal : 20 20
Cumulative Week 3 Subtotal : 48 48
Week 3 Feedback:

Week2
Possible Score Your Score
Discussion Question #1 1.0 1.0
Comment:
You provided a substantive response to this discussion question for this week.
Discussion Question #2 1.0 1.0
Comment:
You provided a substantive response to this discussion question for this week.
Discussion Question #3 1.0 1.0
Comment:
You provided a substantive response to this discussion question for this week.
Participation 3.0 3.0
Comment:
You sucessfully posted to the Main Forum four days (or more) out of the required
four per week. (Reference: Participation section in the syllabus)
AD Design Plan 14.0 14.0
Comment:
I particularly liked the structure of the paper as it methodically covered the
topics with respectable content. Your recommendations were well founded and
practical. You did a very nice job of describing Active Directory and provided
knowledgeable and convincing information in support of your recommendation
(with the single domain approach). Your statement in the opening of your paper
- "Active Directory decreases the amount of time the network administrators
must spend granting access to network resources. Access to the network and
network resources are efficiently organized and managed." - set a very
convincing tone for your eventual recommendation. The ample amount of
references added significant credibility to your document.
Week 2 Subtotal : 20 20
Cumulative Week 2 Subtotal : 28 28
Week 2 Feedback:

Week1
Possible Score Your Score
Discussion Question #1 1.0 1.0
Comment:
You provided a substantive response to this discussion question for this week.
Discussion Question #2 1.0 1.0
Comment:
You provided a substantive response to this discussion question for this week.
Discussion Question #3 1.0 1.0
Comment:
You provided a substantive response to this discussion question for this week.
Participation 3.0 3.0
Comment:
You sucessfully posted to the Main Forum four days (or more) out of the required
four per week. (Reference: Participation section in the syllabus)
Bio 2.0 2.0
Comment:
You provided an interesting biography.
Week 1 Subtotal : 8 8
Cumulative Week 1 Subtotal : 8 8
Week 1 Feedback:
Posted by at No comments:
Labels:

Friday, August 08, 2008

POS420 Introduction to UNIX Final Grade

The faculty member has posted grades for this course (You can also go to your student website to view the details).

Julia Poulsen

POS/420 - BSAF049P97

Grades through Week 5		 Cumulative Score:
97.5/100 (97.5%)

Grade : A

Possible ScoreYour Score
Week 5
Discussion Questions 5.0 5.0
Comment: As usual you answered all DQ's in a timely and interesting manner. Good work.
Participation 2.0 2.0
Comment: You met participation requirements this week and interacted well with your
fellow students. Keep up the good work.
Team Evaluation 5.0 5.0
Comment: You submitted your evaluation of the team, earning full points in this area.
Team Presentation 10.0 9.5
Comment: Your team prepared a very professional and convincing presentation, utilizing
all the research and analysis presented in your paper. Great job!
Team paper 15.0 15.0
Comment: Congratulations on working together with your team to produce a well-written and
well-researched paper that was very interesting.
Week 5 Subtotal : 3736.5
Cumulative Week 5 Subtotal : 10097.5
Week 5 Feedback: I enjoyed having you in class. Best wishes on everything in the future.
Week 4
Discussion Questions 5.0 5.0
Comment: You answered all DQ's, earning full points in this area.
Participation 2.0 2.0
Comment: You met participation requirements this week and interacted well with your
fellow students. Keep up the good work.
Individual Assignment 15.0 13..0
Comment: Your paper was very interesting. Your research was well presented, See other
comments written on the paper.
Week 4 Subtotal : 2220
Cumulative Week 4 Subtotal : 6361
Week 4 Feedback: Once again you've had interesting and informative interactions with your fellow
classmates. Keep up the great work.
Week 3
Discussion Questions 5.0 5.0
Comment: You answered all DQ's, earning full points in this area.
Participation 2.0 2.0
Comment: You met participation requirements this week and interacted well with your
fellow students. Keep up the good work.
Individual Assignment 10.0 10.0
Comment: Your answers to the questions indicate a good understanding of the assignment
you completed.
Week 3 Subtotal : 1717
Cumulative Week 3 Subtotal : 4141
Week 3 Feedback: You are progressing very well. Your answers indicate a good understandng of the
material. Keep up the good work and I look forward to your participation in
the coming weeks.
Week 2
Discussion Questions 5.0 5.0
Comment: You answered all DQ's, earning full points in this area.
Participation 2.0 2.0
Comment: You met participation requirements this week and interacted well with your
fellow students. Keep up the good work.
Individual Assignment 5.0 5.0
Comment: You have answered the question correctly.
Week 2 Subtotal : 1212
Cumulative Week 2 Subtotal : 2424
Week 2 Feedback: Your progress in the class is going very well. Keep up the good work and I look
forward to your participation in the coming weeks.
Week 1
Discussion Questions 5.0 5.0
Comment: You answered all DQ's, earning full points in this area.
Participation 2.0 2.0
Comment: You met participation requirements this week and interacted well with your
fellow students. Keep up the good work.
Learning Team Charter 5.0 5.0
Comment: Your team prepared a good detailed team charter.. Refer to it often if there are
problems and if you run into any problems that can't be handled within the
team, don't hesitate to contact me.
Week 1 Subtotal : 1212
Cumulative Week 1 Subtotal : 1212
Week 1 Feedback: Your progress in the class is going very well. Keep up the good work and I look
forward to your participation in the coming weeks.
Posted by at No comments:
Labels: , ,

Sunday, May 25, 2008

Opinions

If I do this it means another 18 months of no life, no fun, no rest, neglecting my house and my friends. So I figure I should get your opinions.

Each class is 6 weeks long and there are 10 classes for a total of 60 weeks. If I take a week off every other class adds another 5 weeks for a total of 65 weeks. If I take a week off between each class then it is 10 additional weeks for a total of 70 weeks.

If I start in January of 2009 I would be done by June of 2010.

Masters Degree Yay or Nay?

The prices for the graduate program are as follow: $612.00 per credit hour and $95.00 per resource fee. As UOP alumni you get the $95.00 resource fee waived for every class so in reality you would only be paying $1836.00 for each 3 credit class. Your program is 30 credits long so the total cost for your program would be $18,360.00.
Posted by at No comments:
Labels: ,

Sunday, February 18, 2007

Fair Warning

You may be wise to leave me alone for another two weeks. I am really struggling in the current class I am taking and it is making me one impressive bitch. I have so far maintained an 'A' for the course but it has been very, very, difficult.
Posted by at No comments:
Labels: ,
Subscribe to: Posts (Atom)