Monday, September 15, 2008

POS421 Windows Server Networking

Grade Report: POS/421

Grade Summary (Week 1-Week 5)		Grade: A
Total Percentage:	100%
Your Total Score:	100
Total Possible Score:	100

Week5
	Possible Score	Your Score
Discussion Question #1	1.0	1.0
Comment: You provided a substantive response to this discussion question for this week.
Discussion Question #2	1.0	1.0
Comment: You provided a substantive response to this discussion question for this week.
Discussion Question #3	1.0	1.0
Comment: You provided a substantive response to this discussion question for this week.
Participation	3.0	3.0
Comment: You sucessfully posted to the Main Forum four days (or more) out of the required four per week. (Reference: Participation section in the syllabus)
Team Presentation	5.0	5.0
Comment: The presentation was easy on the eyes (nice color/text combination). It followed the content in your paper concisely. The notes accompanying the slides were very well done and would certainly been a very supportive element in the course of a live presentation. This is a very professional presentation in content and visually. It would "sell" the concept to the client.
Team paper	25.0	25.0
Comment: The introduction provided a brief explanation of what the team wished to accomplish, provided some very important details, sold the concept, and gained the confidence of the reader. The Web Application discussion along with the Web Applications Layout diagrams made a very clear point and convincing argument concerning sharing application components. You did a very nice job of comparing Windows Server 2000 and Windows Sever 2003 and supported your dialog with specifics such as included in "Table 1". You made a good point by mentioning very concisely the fundamental differences between Server 2000 and 2003 was scalability, security, and stability. You had a significant amount of references for this paper and used them well as you referred to them though out your paper to support your discussions. This provided a very professional level of credibility to the information in the paper and made it very convincing. Based on your supportive content one would have to agree with the recommendations you provided in the paper.
Week 5 Subtotal :	36	36
Cumulative Week 5 Subtotal :	100	100
Week 5 Feedback:

Week4
	Possible Score	Your Score
Discussion Question #1	1.0	1.0
Comment: You provided a substantive response to this discussion question for this week.
Discussion Question #2	1.0	1.0
Comment: You provided a substantive response to this discussion question for this week.
Discussion Question #3	1.0	1.0
Comment: You provided a substantive response to this discussion question for this week.
Participation	3.0	3.0
Comment: You sucessfully posted to the Main Forum four days (or more) out of the required four per week. (Reference: Participation section in the syllabus)
File Systems Paper	10.0	10.0
Comment: You provided an interesting introduction and established where you were going with the paper. Overall you did a good job on the paper explaining some of the popular file systems Windows has used, and in some cases is still using. You moved through the discussion in a logical progression and provided some very interesting detail and demonstrated depth of understanding with this paper. You balanced you topic by explaining some of the disadvantages as well. You had some very good references in your paper that added a significant amount of authority to your content.
Week 4 Subtotal :	16	16
Cumulative Week 4 Subtotal :	64	64
Week 4 Feedback:

Week3
	Possible Score	Your Score
Discussion Question #1	1.0	1.0
Comment: You provided a substantive response to this discussion question for this week.
Discussion Question #2	1.0	1.0
Comment: You provided a substantive response to this discussion question for this week.
Discussion Question #3	1.0	1.0
Comment: You provided a substantive response to this discussion question for this week.
Participation	3.0	3.0
Comment: You sucessfully posted to the Main Forum four days (or more) out of the required four per week. (Reference: Participation section in the syllabus)
OU Nesting Plan	14.0	14.0
Comment: You did a good job and are persuasively continuing in a positive direction with this proposal. It was very convincing; your conversational style in this respect made it very understandable and easy to read. I particularly felt comfortable with the structure and flow of this proposal. It was an easy read and well done. The diagrams were very professional and provided significant clarity to the proposal. I particularly appreciated the format and structure of your paper. You specifically addressed the OU design with examples and backed it up with very knowledge content. This is an excellent paper and addressed the assignment precisely.
Week 3 Subtotal :	20	20
Cumulative Week 3 Subtotal :	48	48
Week 3 Feedback:

Week2
	Possible Score	Your Score
Discussion Question #1	1.0	1.0
Comment: You provided a substantive response to this discussion question for this week.
Discussion Question #2	1.0	1.0
Comment: You provided a substantive response to this discussion question for this week.
Discussion Question #3	1.0	1.0
Comment: You provided a substantive response to this discussion question for this week.
Participation	3.0	3.0
Comment: You sucessfully posted to the Main Forum four days (or more) out of the required four per week. (Reference: Participation section in the syllabus)
AD Design Plan	14.0	14.0
Comment: I particularly liked the structure of the paper as it methodically covered the topics with respectable content. Your recommendations were well founded and practical. You did a very nice job of describing Active Directory and provided knowledgeable and convincing information in support of your recommendation (with the single domain approach). Your statement in the opening of your paper - "Active Directory decreases the amount of time the network administrators must spend granting access to network resources. Access to the network and network resources are efficiently organized and managed." - set a very convincing tone for your eventual recommendation. The ample amount of references added significant credibility to your document.
Week 2 Subtotal :	20	20
Cumulative Week 2 Subtotal :	28	28
Week 2 Feedback:

Week1
	Possible Score	Your Score
Discussion Question #1	1.0	1.0
Comment: You provided a substantive response to this discussion question for this week.
Discussion Question #2	1.0	1.0
Comment: You provided a substantive response to this discussion question for this week.
Discussion Question #3	1.0	1.0
Comment: You provided a substantive response to this discussion question for this week.
Participation	3.0	3.0
Comment: You sucessfully posted to the Main Forum four days (or more) out of the required four per week. (Reference: Participation section in the syllabus)
Bio	2.0	2.0
Comment: You provided an interesting biography.
Week 1 Subtotal :	8	8
Cumulative Week 1 Subtotal :	8	8
Week 1 Feedback:

No comments:

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)